User talk:Arkhound: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:17, 7 May 2010

Hi, welcome to Hokuto Renkitōza! Thanks for your edit to the Ryū page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Uberfuzzy (Talk) 15:12, 9 May 2009

Ryu

I took some of the info from Wikipedia ("その母親については諸説があるが作中では明記されていない。原作者・武論尊によれば、ラオウとユリアの子にしたかったが、掲載誌が少年誌である都合上、あいまいにするしかなかったという。") and [hokuto.khaotic.info/chara/ryuu.htm Shura no Kuni]. People are still cluelessly asking who his mother is. Something needs to be there to speak to that, you can try to write up something different if you want to. evan1975 21:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Like I wrote in the talk page, I'm aware there are fansites stating that Buronson intended Yuria to be Ryu's mother, I just would like to know the original source for his statement (the interview and the magazine or book it was published) instead of a "he said this or that" statement from a fansite. Arkhound 18:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Images

Thanks for uploading the images! Many people requested at my old website that I use more of the original manga artwork instead of the anime. I have been trying to find original artwork (preferably color) for most characters, so if you can help me there I'd really appreciate it. evan1975 18:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Sure! No prob. I have some stuff from the eBook editions that could be used, but they're mostly in black and white if you don't mind. Arkhound 00:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Commands format

In order to avoid any edit war, I thought we might discuss this here. I feel there's a problem in the presentation of the list of commands, here's a list of things I think can be improved:

The table style is very contrasting from the usual wiki table styles.
It's 2 columns, so there's not much tabular information going on there.
Tables tend to be less easy to use with integrated browsers (like those on a cellphone) so I'd make do without unless it's actually useful to have them.

Personally I think that a definition list fits the bill better, mostly because it is a list of stuff we're defining. I'm sort of a semantic markup fan.

Opinions? --Madness ❧ ^talk 16:17, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :Sure! No prob. I have some stuff from the eBook editions that could be used, but they're mostly in black and white if you don't mind. [[User:Arkhound|Arkhound]] 00:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
+== Commands format ==
+In order to avoid any edit war, I thought we might discuss this here. I feel there's a problem in the presentation of the list of commands, here's a list of things I think can be improved:
+* The table style is very contrasting from the usual wiki table styles.
+* It's 2 columns, so there's not much tabular information going on there.
+* Tables tend to be less easy to use with integrated browsers (like those on a cellphone) so I'd make do without unless it's actually useful to have them.
+Personally I think that a definition list fits the bill better, mostly because it is a list of stuff we're defining.
+I'm sort of a semantic markup fan.
+Opinions? --<span style="line-height:1">[[User:SirRandomage|Madness ❧]] <sup>[[User talk:SirRandomage|talk]]</sup></span> 16:17, May 7, 2010 (UTC)