0
edits
User talk:Arkhound: Difference between revisions
→Commands format: new section
(→Images) |
SirRandomage (talk | contribs) (→Commands format: new section) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Sure! No prob. I have some stuff from the eBook editions that could be used, but they're mostly in black and white if you don't mind. [[User:Arkhound|Arkhound]] 00:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC) | :Sure! No prob. I have some stuff from the eBook editions that could be used, but they're mostly in black and white if you don't mind. [[User:Arkhound|Arkhound]] 00:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Commands format == | |||
In order to avoid any edit war, I thought we might discuss this here. I feel there's a problem in the presentation of the list of commands, here's a list of things I think can be improved: | |||
* The table style is very contrasting from the usual wiki table styles. | |||
* It's 2 columns, so there's not much tabular information going on there. | |||
* Tables tend to be less easy to use with integrated browsers (like those on a cellphone) so I'd make do without unless it's actually useful to have them. | |||
Personally I think that a definition list fits the bill better, mostly because it is a list of stuff we're defining. | |||
I'm sort of a semantic markup fan. | |||
Opinions? --<span style="line-height:1">[[User:SirRandomage|Madness ❧]] <sup>[[User talk:SirRandomage|talk]]</sup></span> 16:17, May 7, 2010 (UTC) | |||